Hi Krzysztof, > > Here, this should be as a top line: > > > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > > > > > > So I agree with the SPDX id but also pointing to the use of the C++ // > > comment style as requested by Linus [1] > > Thanks for the reference. I see that Linus prefers converting entire > comment into // style. I was not arguing about SPDX line but entire > existing copyright comment which follows it: > > > +// > > +// Copyright (c) 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > > +// Jaswinder Singh <jassi.brar@xxxxxxxxxxx> it just looks ugly to me to have something like // SPDX... /* * Copyright (c)... * Jasw... */ I would make everything of the '//' style (I've also seen that this is the trend also in other subsystems), but honestly I don't really care. If you're strong on not moving entirely in '//' style then I can resend it with the double comment style. Andi P.S. About GPLv2 vs GPLv2+ I checked and I will repost it keeping the license as its original. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html