On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:11:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> This adds a hard Kconfig dependency on HWSPINLOCK, which is the >> simplest solution since we don't care about building for the case >> without HWSPINLOCK. > > Given that there are stubs for HWSPINLOCK it'd be good to also have an > || COMPILE_TEST in there, otherwise what's the point in the stubs? As far as I'm concerned, we can remove those stubs, it's easy enough to compile-test with hwspinlock enabled, and the existing in-kernel users all require hwspinlock anyway. I've sent a second version now, please pick whichever you prefer. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html