[PATCH v4 2/5] ACPI / property: Don't evaluate objects for devices w/o handle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabricated devices such as LNXPWRBN lack a handle, causing evaluation
of _CCA and _DSD to always fail with AE_BAD_PARAMETER.  While that is
merely a (negligible) waste of processing power, evaluating a _DSM for
them (such as Apple's device properties _DSM which we're about to add)
results in an ugly error:

    ACPI: \: failed to evaluate _DSM (0x1001)

Avoid by not evaluating _DSD and the upcoming _DSM for devices without
handle.

Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/property.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
index a65c09cc223f..834e01bee015 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
@@ -338,6 +338,9 @@ void acpi_init_properties(struct acpi_device *adev)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&adev->data.subnodes);
 
+	if (!adev->handle)
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * Check if ACPI_DT_NAMESPACE_HID is present and inthat case we fill in
 	 * Device Tree compatible properties for this device.
-- 
2.11.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux