On 25/07/17 09:28, Martin Hundebøll wrote: >> My patchset kind of stalled. I can do a refresh if there's interest. >> But I really do need some help from people with access to hardware (I can >> cover spi-orion and spi-fsl-espi but that's about it). After the >> initial RFC series I posted in May I found that iMX platforms use the integer >> cs_gpio field for both native chipselects and gpio based ones (values < >> 0 indicate native CS) so again I'd be coding blind trying to >> disentangle that. > > My submission was more or less a fly-by patch, but I'd be happy to > test/debug patches on spi-imx if you CC me on the series. Thanks for the offer. Now I just need to get a few round tuits. > > Any other drivers with special gpio-cs handling? > Based on a quick grep spi-{atmel,davinci,ep93xx,gpio,imx,mt65xx,stm32} all do stuff with cs_gpios outside of the spi core. I think at least some of those a trivially handled if we let the core code do the gpio management. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html