On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:40:20PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Provide a module parameter to request internal > loop by the SPI master controller. > This should make loop testing easier without extra HW modification. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c > index f4875f177df0..34e1544d7d0e 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c > @@ -51,6 +51,14 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(loopback, > "is checked to match tx_buf after the spi_message " \ > "is executed"); > > +/* the device is jumpered for loopback - enabling some rx_buf tests */ > +int loop_req; > +module_param(loop_req, int, 0); > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(loop_req, > + "if set enable controller will be asked to enable " \ > + "test loop mode. If supported, MISO and MOSI will be " \ > + "jumpered by SPI controller"); > + > /* run only a specific test */ > int run_only_test = -1; > module_param(run_only_test, int, 0); > @@ -313,6 +321,16 @@ static int spi_loopback_test_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > { > int ret; > > + if (loop_req) { > + spi->mode = SPI_LOOP | spi->mode; > + ret = spi_setup(spi); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI setup wasn't successful %d\n", ret); > + dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI_LOOP is not supported by SPI master."); Why two error messages here? What about: dev_err(&spi->dev, "SPI setup with SPI_LOOP failed (%d)\n", ret); These lines are > 80 chars, so you should break them. > + return -ENODEV; return ret? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html