Hi Sascha On 05/31/2017 05:10 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:19:58AM -0700, jiada_wang@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Previously i.MX SPI controller only works in Master mode. >> This patch adds support to i.MX51, i.MX53 and i.MX6 ECSPI >> controller to work also in Slave mode. >> >> Currently SPI Slave mode support patch has the following limitations: >> 1. The stale data in RXFIFO will be dropped when the Slave does any new >> transfer. >> 2. One transfer can be finished only after all transfer->len data been >> transferred to master device >> 3. Slave device only accepts transfer->len data. Any data longer than this >> from master device will be dropped. Any data shorter than this from >> master will cause SPI to stuck due to mentioned HW limitation 2. >> 4. Only PIO transfer is supported in Slave mode. >> >> Following HW limitation applies: >> 1. ECSPI has a HW issue when works in Slave mode, after 64 >> words written to TXFIFO, even TXFIFO becomes empty, >> ECSPI_TXDATA keeps shift out the last word data, >> so we have to disable ECSPI when in slave mode after the >> transfer completes >> 2. Due to Freescale errata ERR003775 "eCSPI: Burst completion by Chip >> Select (SS) signal in Slave mode is not functional" burst size must >> be set exactly to the size of the transfer. This limit SPI transaction >> with maximum 2^12 bits. This errata affects i.MX53 and i.MX6 ECSPI >> controllers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 227 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 195 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c >> index 765856c..a227a30 100644 >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c >> @@ -53,9 +53,13 @@ >> /* generic defines to abstract from the different register layouts */ >> #define MXC_INT_RR (1 << 0) /* Receive data ready interrupt */ >> #define MXC_INT_TE (1 << 1) /* Transmit FIFO empty interrupt */ >> +#define MXC_INT_RDR BIT(4) /* Receive date threshold interrupt */ >> >> /* The maximum bytes that a sdma BD can transfer.*/ >> #define MAX_SDMA_BD_BYTES (1 << 15) >> +/* The maximum bytes that IMX53_ECSPI can transfer in slave mode.*/ >> +#define MX53_MAX_TRANSFER_BYTES 512 >> + >> struct spi_imx_config { >> unsigned int speed_hz; >> unsigned int bpw; >> @@ -79,6 +83,7 @@ struct spi_imx_devtype_data { >> void (*trigger)(struct spi_imx_data *); >> int (*rx_available)(struct spi_imx_data *); >> void (*reset)(struct spi_imx_data *); >> + void (*disable)(struct spi_imx_data *); >> enum spi_imx_devtype devtype; >> }; >> >> @@ -105,6 +110,11 @@ struct spi_imx_data { >> const void *tx_buf; >> unsigned int txfifo; /* number of words pushed in tx FIFO */ >> >> + /* Slave mode */ >> + bool slave_mode; >> + bool slave_aborted; >> + unsigned int slave_burst; >> + >> /* DMA */ >> bool usedma; >> u32 wml; >> @@ -157,6 +167,17 @@ static inline bool spi_imx_has_dmamode(struct spi_imx_data *d) >> } >> } >> >> +static inline bool spi_imx_has_slavemode(const struct spi_imx_devtype_data *d) >> +{ >> + switch (d->devtype) { >> + case IMX51_ECSPI: >> + case IMX53_ECSPI: >> + return true; >> + default: >> + return false; >> + } >> +} > Add a new boolean flag to struct spi_imx_devtype_data instead. > > >> + >> #define MXC_SPI_BUF_RX(type) \ >> static void spi_imx_buf_rx_##type(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx) \ >> { \ >> @@ -287,6 +308,7 @@ static bool spi_imx_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi, >> #define MX51_ECSPI_INT 0x10 >> #define MX51_ECSPI_INT_TEEN (1 << 0) >> #define MX51_ECSPI_INT_RREN (1 << 3) >> +#define MX51_ECSPI_INT_RDREN (1 << 4) >> >> #define MX51_ECSPI_DMA 0x14 >> #define MX51_ECSPI_DMA_TX_WML(wml) ((wml) & 0x3f) >> @@ -303,6 +325,51 @@ static bool spi_imx_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi, >> #define MX51_ECSPI_TESTREG 0x20 >> #define MX51_ECSPI_TESTREG_LBC BIT(31) >> >> +static void mx53_ecspi_rx_slave(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx) >> +{ >> + u32 val = be32_to_cpu(readl(spi_imx->base + MXC_CSPIRXDATA)); >> + >> + if (spi_imx->rx_buf) { >> + int shift = spi_imx->slave_burst % sizeof(val); >> + >> + if (shift) { >> + memcpy(spi_imx->rx_buf, >> + ((u8 *)&val) + sizeof(val) - shift, shift); >> + } else { >> + *((u32 *)spi_imx->rx_buf) = val; >> + shift = sizeof(val); >> + } >> + >> + spi_imx->rx_buf += shift; >> + spi_imx->slave_burst -= shift; >> + } >> +} >> + >> +static void mx53_ecspi_tx_slave(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx) >> +{ >> + u32 val = 0; >> + int shift = spi_imx->count % sizeof(val); >> + >> + if (spi_imx->tx_buf) { >> + if (shift) { >> + memcpy(((u8 *)&val) + sizeof(val) - shift, >> + spi_imx->tx_buf, shift); >> + } else { >> + val = *((u32 *)spi_imx->tx_buf); >> + shift = sizeof(val); >> + } >> + val = cpu_to_be32(val); >> + spi_imx->tx_buf += shift; >> + } >> + >> + if (!shift) >> + shift = sizeof(val); > A better name for 'shift' is n_bytes. Its value should be calculated > before the if (spi_imx->tx_buf) block. Then you can use memcpy for the > four byte case aswell. > > > But anyway, have you tested this function for anything with > spi_imx->count % sizeof(val) != 0? In this case you have to put the fill > the FIFO only partly somewhere. I would assume you have to do this at > the end of the transfer, but you do this at the beginning. Can this > work? Yes, I have tested the case when "spi_imx->count % sizeof(val) != 0", it works. based on what I observed, when the data bits written to FIFO exceeds burst len, then the 'old' bits will be dropped. I will update this patch set to address your review comments in v3 Thanks, Jiada >> + >> + spi_imx->count -= shift; >> + >> + writel(val, spi_imx->base + MXC_CSPITXDATA); >> +} >> + >> /* MX51 eCSPI */ >> static unsigned int mx51_ecspi_clkdiv(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx, >> unsigned int fspi, unsigned int *fres) >> @@ -352,6 +419,9 @@ static void mx51_ecspi_intctrl(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx, int enable) >> if (enable & MXC_INT_RR) >> val |= MX51_ECSPI_INT_RREN; >> >> + if (enable & MXC_INT_RDR) >> + val |= MX51_ECSPI_INT_RDREN; >> + >> writel(val, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_INT); >> } >> >> @@ -364,6 +434,15 @@ static void mx51_ecspi_trigger(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx) >> writel(reg, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL); >> } >> >> +static void __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_disable(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx) > I don't see how this function may end up unused. > >> +{ >> + u32 ctrl; >> + >> + ctrl = readl(spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL); >> + ctrl &= ~MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_ENABLE; >> + writel(ctrl, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL); >> +} >> + >> static int mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_device *spi, >> struct spi_imx_config *config) >> { >> @@ -372,14 +451,11 @@ static int mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_device *spi, >> u32 clk = config->speed_hz, delay, reg; >> u32 cfg = readl(spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG); >> >> - /* >> - * The hardware seems to have a race condition when changing modes. The >> - * current assumption is that the selection of the channel arrives >> - * earlier in the hardware than the mode bits when they are written at >> - * the same time. >> - * So set master mode for all channels as we do not support slave mode. >> - */ >> - ctrl |= MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_MODE_MASK; >> + /* set Master or Slave mode */ >> + if (spi_imx->slave_mode) >> + ctrl &= ~MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_MODE_MASK; >> + else >> + ctrl |= MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_MODE_MASK; >> >> /* >> * Enable SPI_RDY handling (falling edge/level triggered). >> @@ -394,9 +470,21 @@ static int mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_device *spi, >> /* set chip select to use */ >> ctrl |= MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_CS(spi->chip_select); >> >> - ctrl |= (config->bpw - 1) << MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_BL_OFFSET; >> + if (spi_imx->slave_mode && is_imx53_ecspi(spi_imx)) >> + ctrl |= (spi_imx->slave_burst * 8 - 1) >> + << MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_BL_OFFSET; >> + else >> + ctrl |= (config->bpw - 1) << MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_BL_OFFSET; >> >> - cfg |= MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG_SBBCTRL(spi->chip_select); >> + /* >> + * eCSPI burst completion by Chip Select signal in Slave mode >> + * is not functional for imx53 Soc, config SPI burst completed when >> + * BURST_LENGTH + 1 bits are received >> + */ >> + if (spi_imx->slave_mode && is_imx53_ecspi(spi_imx)) >> + cfg &= ~MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG_SBBCTRL(spi->chip_select); >> + else >> + cfg |= MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG_SBBCTRL(spi->chip_select); >> >> if (spi->mode & SPI_CPHA) >> cfg |= MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG_SCLKPHA(spi->chip_select); >> @@ -775,6 +863,7 @@ static struct spi_imx_devtype_data imx51_ecspi_devtype_data = { >> .trigger = mx51_ecspi_trigger, >> .rx_available = mx51_ecspi_rx_available, >> .reset = mx51_ecspi_reset, >> + .disable = mx51_ecspi_disable, >> .devtype = IMX51_ECSPI, >> }; >> >> @@ -784,6 +873,7 @@ static struct spi_imx_devtype_data imx53_ecspi_devtype_data = { >> .trigger = mx51_ecspi_trigger, >> .rx_available = mx51_ecspi_rx_available, >> .reset = mx51_ecspi_reset, >> + .disable = mx51_ecspi_disable, >> .devtype = IMX53_ECSPI, >> }; >> >> @@ -846,14 +936,16 @@ static void spi_imx_push(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx) >> spi_imx->txfifo++; >> } >> >> - spi_imx->devtype_data->trigger(spi_imx); >> + if (!spi_imx->slave_mode) >> + spi_imx->devtype_data->trigger(spi_imx); >> } >> >> static irqreturn_t spi_imx_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) >> { >> struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx = dev_id; >> >> - while (spi_imx->devtype_data->rx_available(spi_imx)) { >> + while (spi_imx->txfifo && >> + spi_imx->devtype_data->rx_available(spi_imx)) { >> spi_imx->rx(spi_imx); >> spi_imx->txfifo--; >> } >> @@ -952,7 +1044,8 @@ static int spi_imx_setupxfer(struct spi_device *spi, >> spi_imx->tx = spi_imx_buf_tx_u32; >> } >> >> - if (spi_imx_can_dma(spi_imx->bitbang.master, spi, t)) >> + if (!spi_imx->slave_mode && >> + spi_imx_can_dma(spi_imx->bitbang.master, spi, t)) >> spi_imx->usedma = 1; > So in spi_imx_can_dma() you may return true for a slave mode transfer > and here we end up doing PIO for the same transfer. That doesn't look > correct. You should move the test for slave mode into spi_imx_can_dma(). > >> else >> spi_imx->usedma = 0; >> @@ -964,6 +1057,12 @@ static int spi_imx_setupxfer(struct spi_device *spi, >> return ret; >> } >> >> + if (is_imx53_ecspi(spi_imx) && spi_imx->slave_mode) { >> + spi_imx->rx = mx53_ecspi_rx_slave; >> + spi_imx->tx = mx53_ecspi_tx_slave; >> + spi_imx->slave_burst = t->len; >> + } >> + >> spi_imx->devtype_data->config(spi, &config); >> >> return 0; >> @@ -1125,16 +1224,50 @@ static int spi_imx_pio_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, >> struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); >> unsigned long transfer_timeout; >> unsigned long timeout; >> + int ret = transfer->len; >> + >> + if (is_imx53_ecspi(spi_imx) && spi_imx->slave_mode && >> + transfer->len > MX53_MAX_TRANSFER_BYTES) { >> + pr_err("Transaction too big, max size is %d bytes\n", >> + MX53_MAX_TRANSFER_BYTES); > Don't use pr_* functions when you have a struct device * available. > >> + return -EMSGSIZE; >> + } >> >> spi_imx->tx_buf = transfer->tx_buf; >> spi_imx->rx_buf = transfer->rx_buf; >> spi_imx->count = transfer->len; >> spi_imx->txfifo = 0; >> >> + if (spi_imx->slave_mode) >> + spi_imx->slave_burst = spi_imx->count; > You have set this in spi_imx_setupxfer() already. Why here again? > >> + >> reinit_completion(&spi_imx->xfer_done); >> + spi_imx->slave_aborted = false; >> >> spi_imx_push(spi_imx); >> >> + if (spi_imx->slave_mode) { >> + spi_imx->devtype_data->intctrl(spi_imx, MXC_INT_TE | >> + MXC_INT_RDR); >> + >> + if (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&spi_imx->xfer_done) || >> + spi_imx->slave_aborted) { >> + dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "interrupted\n"); >> + ret = -EINTR; >> + } >> + >> + /* ecspi has a HW issue when works in Slave mode, >> + * after 64 words writtern to TXFIFO, even TXFIFO becomes empty, >> + * ECSPI_TXDATA keeps shift out the last word data, >> + * so we have to disable ECSPI when in slave mode after the >> + * transfer completes >> + */ >> + if (spi_imx->devtype_data->disable) >> + spi_imx->devtype_data->disable(spi_imx); >> + >> + goto out; >> + } >> + >> spi_imx->devtype_data->intctrl(spi_imx, MXC_INT_TE); >> >> transfer_timeout = spi_imx_calculate_timeout(spi_imx, transfer->len); > You are adding more lines to spi_imx_pio_transfer() than the original > function had, most of them inside a if(spi_imx->slave_mode). > It would probably more readable if you introduced a separate > spi_imx_pio_transfer_slave(). > > Sascha > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html