On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Now struct spi_master is used for both SPI master and slave controllers, > it makes sense to rename it to struct spi_controller, and replace > "master" by "controller" where appropriate. > For now this conversion is done for SPI core infrastructure only. > Wrappers are provided for backwards compatibility, until all SPI drivers > have been converted. This makes sense to me. The patch needs a rebase though. > I guess we don't need an spi_busnum_to_slave()? > There's also only one user of spi_busnum_to_master(), in > drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft_device.c Hrm, I'm not sure that either of those functions has a strong use case. I'm not quite sure from a quick glance at that staging driver what exactly it's trying to do there, it looks like it's something that'd need refactoring to go out of staging.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
