On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This allows using the xbar driver on ARX300 based SoCs which require the > same xbar setup as the xRX200 chipsets because the xbar driver > initialization is not guarded by an xRX200 specific > of_machine_is_compatible condition anymore. Additionally the new driver > takes a syscon phandle to configure the XBAR endianness bits in RCU > (before this was done in arch/mips/lantiq/xway/reset.c and also > guarded by an VRX200 specific if-statement). > +#include <linux/ioport.h> I'm not sure you need this. > +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> And these lines are under question, see below. > +#include <linux/regmap.h> > + > +#include <lantiq_soc.h> This rather should be "lantiq_soc.h" > +static int ltq_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > + struct resource res_xbar; > + struct regmap *rcu_regmap; > + void __iomem *xbar_membase; > + u32 rcu_ahb_endianness_reg_offset; > + u32 rcu_ahb_endianness_val; > + int ret; > + > + ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res_xbar); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get xbar resources"); > + return ret; > + } > + > + if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res_xbar.start, > + resource_size(&res_xbar), > + res_xbar.name)) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get xbar resources"); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + > + xbar_membase = devm_ioremap_nocache(dev, res_xbar.start, > + resource_size(&res_xbar)); > + if (!xbar_membase) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to remap xbar resources"); > + return -ENODEV; > + } And what's wrong with traditional pattern y = platform_get_resource(IOMEM); x = devm_ioremap_resource(y); if (IS_ERR(x)) return PTR_ERR(x); ? > + > + /* RCU configuration is optional */ > + rcu_regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "lantiq,rcu-syscon"); > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rcu_regmap)) { > + if (of_property_read_u32_index(np, "lantiq,rcu-syscon", 1, > + &rcu_ahb_endianness_reg_offset)) { device_property_*() ? > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get RCU reg offset\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (of_device_is_big_endian(np)) Do we have common helper for this (I mean resource provider agnostic one)? > + rcu_ahb_endianness_val = RCU_VR9_BE_AHB1S; > + else > + rcu_ahb_endianness_val = 0; > + > + if (regmap_update_bits(rcu_regmap, > + rcu_ahb_endianness_reg_offset, > + RCU_VR9_BE_AHB1S, > + rcu_ahb_endianness_val)) > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, > + "Failed to configure RCU AHB endianness\n"); > + } > + > + /* disable fpi burst */ > + ltq_w32_mask(XBAR_FPI_BURST_EN, 0, > + xbar_membase + XBAR_ALWAYS_LAST); > + > + return 0; > +} > +builtin_platform_driver(xbar_driver); Why it can't be module? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html