Hi Leonard, On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@xxxxxxx> wrote: > A fix was already posted: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/18/264. Can you > check it in your scenario? I don't know if a revert or a fix is more > appropriate. I have tested this patch and it does not solve the SPI NOR detection issue. That's why I sent a revert. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Revert "spi: imx: dynamic burst length adjust for PIO mode"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Revert "spi: imx: dynamic burst length adjust for PIO mode"
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:22:18 -0300
- Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxx>, "linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <1495115958.26925.23.camel@nxp.com>
- References: <1495113735-11891-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@nxp.com> <1495115958.26925.23.camel@nxp.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] spi: imx: Revert "spi: imx: dynamic burst length adjust for PIO mode"
- From: Fabio Estevam
- Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Revert "spi: imx: dynamic burst length adjust for PIO mode"
- From: Leonard Crestez
- [PATCH] spi: imx: Revert "spi: imx: dynamic burst length adjust for PIO mode"
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Revert "spi: imx: dynamic burst length adjust for PIO mode"
- Next by Date: Re: spidev: Adjust five checks for null pointers
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Revert "spi: imx: dynamic burst length adjust for PIO mode"
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: imx: Revert "spi: imx: dynamic burst length adjust for PIO mode"
- Index(es):
 |