On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 02:24:00PM +0200, Seraphime Kirkovski wrote: > I think, this change is necessary, on the one hand, because there are still > a lot of longterm[2] supported kernels out there, whose users may be relying on > SPI_IOC_WR_MAX_SPEED being system-wide and, on the other hand, this > same command has been exhibiting a different behaviour for 3 years now, > so its users may break, if 9169051617df7 is reverted in one way or > another. Do we have any evidence that such users exist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
