On 05/05, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I'm using signal_wake_up() to abort a task blocked on > wait_for_completion_interruptible(), cfr. sh_msiof_slave_abort() in > "spi: sh-msiof: Add slave mode support" > (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg175575.html). > > Is exporting signal_wake_up_state() an acceptable solution? > Alternatively, I can extract the code to abort an completion into a > generic abort_completion() function, and export that. I too do not think this is a good idea... signal_wake_up() or even set_tsk_thread_flag() should never be used unless you actually send a signal. Yes, freeze_task() does this too but note that recalc_sigpending() checks freezing() and in this case we really want the target to enter the get_signal() path. And in fact I do not really understand why do you need it, it seems that you can easily rework this code and avoid this hack. Not to mention that sh_msiof_slave_abort() plays with struct completion internals, this doesn't look good too. Finally, clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING) in sh_msiof_wait_for_completion() looks wrong. Or it is only for kthreads? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html