On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:21:18PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Also, if you question setting the RT priority in the devicetree, why > > was that functionality allowed for pl022 in the first place? > > This was being done via platform data not via device tree, unlike > platform data device tree should provide a long term stable OS neutral > ABI. No, specifying it via the device tree was subsequently added with commit 39a6ac11df65 ("spi/pl022: Devicetree support w/o platform data"), sorry for not mentioning this in the commit message. There's already a bool in struct spi_master for this functionality and device tree support for pl022, so I don't quite understand why converting the bool to an int and adding device tree support for bcm2835 would be the wrong approach? Thanks, Lukas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html