Instead of requiring the hsspi clock to have a rate, allow using a second clock for providing the Hz rate, which is probably more correct anyway. Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c index 55789f7cda92..79096d17ebde 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx-hsspi.c @@ -351,8 +351,16 @@ static int bcm63xx_hsspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(clk); rate = clk_get_rate(clk); - if (!rate) - return -EINVAL; + if (!rate) { + struct clk *pll_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pll"); + + if (IS_ERR(pll_clk)) + return PTR_ERR(pll_clk); + + rate = clk_get_rate(pll_clk); + if (!rate) + return -EINVAL; + } ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk); if (ret) -- 2.11.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html