On 17/02/2017 17:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Frode Isaksen <fisaksen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Higher bitrate and lower CPU load if using PIO in this case. >> >> Signed-off-by: Frode Isaksen <fisaksen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c | 13 +++++++------ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c b/drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c >> index b69a370..826bff1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c >> @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ >> #define SPIDEF 0x4c >> #define SPIFMT0 0x50 >> >> +#define DMA_MIN_BYTES 16 > 16 seems low as the cutoff. Have you found this experimentally and > tested that for e.g. 32 > bytes there is actually an advantage in using DMA? Yes, I have tested for different sizes. Actually 32 bytes is better @30MHz, but if the bit rate goes down, DMA wins over PIO. Do you prefer 32 bytes ? Frode > > Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html