On 01/20/2017 07:50 PM, Kamal Dasu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 01/20/2017 05:33 PM, Kamal Dasu wrote: >>> Marek, >>> >>>>> >>>>> OK, so I'm fine with leaving the patch as is for now but I would like Marek >>>>> review just to be sure we didn't miss something: Marek, any comments? >>>>> >>>>> I just have one more comment below but it's only a detail. >>>> >>>> What would happen if you have a FS attached on this SPI NOR (like UBIFS) >>>> and you suspend with this patch ? Will it survive ? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I have tried with both jffs2 rw and ubifs rw rootfs on spi-nor >>> booting from spi-nor partitions while active filesystem operations >>> were going on over suspend/resume cycles. And it survives. >> >> Can you elaborate on your test a bit ? >> > > The power management test puts board in standby mode, during > standby the DRAM is in refresh and power to the spi-nor is removed. > After a set timeout the board wakes up again and resumes from where it > left off. This pm test is run while a cp command is invoked where a > file is transferred to the rw rootfs. The test loops through said > number of iterations of suspend and resumes cycles. The copy > operations is eventually done over a few cycles. Once the test is > completed filesystem should have no corruptions, the copied files > should compare and rootfs should be intact. This test was repeated > with jffs2 as well as ubifs rootfs flashed on spi-nor device. Would be much nicer if you could just share the script you used. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html