On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:29:02AM +0800, Phil Reid wrote: > On 5/01/2017 09:01, Mark Brown wrote: > > I applied this before you started discussing the approach... > There was a v2 of the patch sent Tue 12:54 +0800 > Which uses the bus number. > There's also a problem with the name registering the name of the irq. This was also after I applied the patch. > Please let me know how to proceed. > Should I apply new patches against v1 of this patch now? Yes, please.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
