On 12/23/2016 10:04 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > Hello, Hi, > On 23 December 2016 at 19:53, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 12/23/2016 04:33 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote: >>> Le 17/08/2016 à 21:09, Heiner Kallweit a écrit : >>>> Consider a message size limit when calculating the maximum amount >>>> of data that can be read. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Applied to git://github.com/spi-nor/linux.git >> >> Is that the concensus now that we should fix controller crappiness on >> driver level ? Or did I miss the point of this patch ? >> > > In general most controllers do have some limit on the amount of data > they can transfer at once. My observations suggest otherwise. > For some you can apply workaround at controller driver level and for > some it's not practical. > > Also for some the limit is lower so it is more likely hit. > > I guess you can call controllers that have both of these limitations > crappy but that's what's in the silicone out there. > > If you have better solution to the problem please share it in detail. I don't have a solution, but I am quite sure that if we now set a precedent that each and every device driver should take care of each and every controller's quirk, we have a lot of unpleasant work ahead of us and it will be quite the maintanance burden. The separations between device driver and controller driver has been weakened and I don't think that's good. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html