On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:36:29AM +0100, Romain Perier wrote: > Hello, > > Le 16/12/2016 à 10:33, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > >We need "irq" to be an int because platform_get_irq() returns negative > >error codes. > > > >Fixes: 5762ab71eb24 ("spi: Add support for Armada 3700 SPI Controller") > >Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-armada-3700.c b/drivers/spi/spi-armada-3700.c > >index e89da0af45d2..5c7508dc6f0b 100644 > >--- a/drivers/spi/spi-armada-3700.c > >+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-armada-3700.c > >@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ struct a3700_spi { > > struct spi_master *master; > > void __iomem *base; > > struct clk *clk; > >- unsigned int irq; > >+ int irq; > > unsigned int flags; > > bool xmit_data; > > const u8 *tx_buf; > > > > It is already fixed, see https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=f6f0083cca66e673cca6fa26b52b107b5570081d > Ah good. > And no we cannot just replace the type of the irq field like this > because devm_request_irq/request_irq require an unsigned int as > "irq" parameter. That's immaterial, my patch works fine. There are other place that use a signed IRQ like the irq handler and platform_get_irq() which I mentioned in my patch description. It's never going to be perfectly consistent. But this is actually important that you thought it mattered. Is there something that prints a warning? These irq signedness bugs are some of the most common recurring bugs I see so it would help to figure out why people are doing this... regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html