Hi Mark, On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:47:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > If the concern from the previous reviews to do with not using DMA is > > > there some reason it's hard to do DMA? > > > I think just like Alexandru that it is orthogonal. But to really > > answer, no, it's not difficult. There's just been some fundamental > > disagreement on whether DMA was supposed to be optional or not that > > stalled everything I guess. > > Oh, I seem to remember some patches adding DMA support that were doing > some strange special snowflake thing with ignoring errors now that I > think about it but that's not this one... why did nobody ever follow up > on those? I have no idea. I think last time we discussed this was last July. Especially with this in now, there's probably no rush anyway. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
