Re: [PATCH v2 02/23] spi: fsl-espi: remove unused elements n_rx and n_tx in struct fsl_espi_transfer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 11:04:29PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Am 03.09.2016 um 02:09 schrieb Mark Brown:

> > I'm missing a lot of patches from this series, at least the first one
> > but there's a bunch of others too.  Please check and resend.

> Patches 1 and 4-7 of the series you applied already. Yesterday I sent
> a v2 of patches 2, 3 and about an hour later v2 of patches 8-23.

Patch numbering exists solely in order to sort the patches within the
series you're sending.  If you've previously sent patches that's totally
irrelevant and confuses things, just number the patches in order without
gaps.

> Based on your review comments it's mainly about reordering patches
> (do trivial things first), smaller code style fixes, and mainly rebasing.
> Maybe some issue with referencing the mails correctly?

Not sure what you mean here but if you're trying to send the patches in
reply to their versions in the earlier series that also confuses things.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux