On 08/04/2016 02:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 06:13:06PM -0400, Kamal Dasu wrote: >> Added device tree bindings documentation for SoCs supported by the >> new spi-bcm-qspi, spi-brcmstb-qspi driver. > > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the > subsystem. This makes it easier for people to identify relevant > patches. Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are > doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're > doing. What's wrong with the subjects being used here? It's not like there is a consistent subject for DT bindings, is spi/dt what you would expect here? Can we save Kamal another round of patches and provide feedback on the patch contents (as well as their form)? -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html