Hello, On 19 July 2016 at 01:02, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:35:41AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> SPI slave devices are not created when looking up driver for the slave >> fails. Create a device anyway so it can be used with spidev. > >> rc = of_modalias_node(nc, spi->modalias, >> sizeof(spi->modalias)); >> if (rc < 0) { >> - dev_err(&master->dev, "cannot find modalias for %s\n", >> + dev_warn(&master->dev, "cannot find modalias for %s\n", > > Nothing has change since you last sent this patch which converts > of_modailias_node() into something which looks up a driver so the > patch description still fails to describe what the patch is doing. > > Please don't ignore review comments, people are generally making them > for a reason and are likely to have the same concerns if issues remain > unaddressed. Having to repeat the same comments can get repetitive and > make people question the value of time spent reviewing. If you disagree > with the review comments that's fine but you need to reply and discuss > your concerns so that the reviewer can understand your decisions. I have split the other part of the patch. Regarding the commit message if you have suggestion for better wording please do share it. >From my point of view the conceptual change described in the commit message is that whenever SPI slave node is encountered in devicetree you get either a device with active driver or a device with no driver whereas previously you either got a device with active driver or no device. So yes, it's about allowing SPI slave devices without a driver bound to them. The technical implementation detail that can be seen in the patch is ignoring the return value of of_modalias_node. Thanks Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html