Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:04:33AM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > >> For these "tricky" cases, at the time I created sg_split I had done a tester as >> well. It's very basic, doesn't cover all the corner cases, is a bit dumb, but >> you might have a look, and the brain cost you'll pay to adapt it to test what >> you want will hopefully pay off by the knowledge gained on scatterlist. It is >> appended at the end of the mail. > > Might be worth getting this into the kernel source, under tools/testing > perhaps? Maybe so. I'll try, but I don't trust much my chances of success, given that this tester : - should compile and link in $(TOP)/lib/scatterlist.c, as this is where sg_split() is defined - this implies all its includes - this implies at least these ones : bug.h mm.h scatterlist.h string.h types.h - this implies having page_to_phys and co. defined somewhere without draining the whole include/linux and include/asm* trees For the tester, I had created an apart include/linux tree where all the includes were _manually_ filled in with minimal content. I don't know if an existing selftest had already this kind of problem, ie. having to compile and link a kernel .c file, and that makes me feel this might be difficult to keep a nice standalone tester. Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html