On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:23:38PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 04:07:52PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > If that's the case then it's definitely broken - we either always warn > > or never warn, neither is good. > For DT we warn if the device is used directly (by the node name) as > previously. For ACPI we never warn because it is not possible to use the > node name directly. We always require use of a proper compatible string. > I don't see how that is broken. So you're saying that it's not possible for ACPI to use anything *except* an explicitly listed compatible string to bind? What we want to avoid is any ACPI tables that explicitly list spidev since that's a total abstraction failure.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
