On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:17:08AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 05:43:03AM +0000, Rich Felker wrote: > > > changes based on ml discussion of the v2 patch. The chipselect change > > has not been made yet, except for rewriting the current logic to be > > more clear. If the decision is that it's needed, I can do it easily, > > but it needs testing still. > > You need to fix that, it's not good to just decide to ignore review > comments. It is astonishing that you are doing this while expecting to > bypass the normal process for merging things. I'm not going to look at > this version, please ensure you have addressed all the feedback from the > previous review before any new version you submit. I've made and tested a change that looks like what you want, with the hw->csReg's chipselect bits set initially high in the probe function, and only the requested bit being modified by the chipselect function. Would you prefer I continue to submit this driver with new versions of the patch series, or separate it out for further review on its own? Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html