On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 05:35:46PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Has there been any discussion on whether dynamically adding the MBus > window is a good idea, as opposed to statically defining it in the > board .dts ? > So far, the only driver that was using dynamically allocated MBus is > the PCIe controller driver, because there is no way in advanced to know > the number and memory window requirements of the PCIe devices that will > be connected to the system. > For all other windows (BootROM, crypto SRAM and more recently network > related SRAM), we are using statically allocated windows. Is this a case where we used to use static assignment because we didn't have a mechanism for dynamic assignment but now have a mechanism for dynamic assignment? In other words is there any advantage to doing the assignments statically given that we can do them dynamically?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
