> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:00 AM > To: Shubhrajyoti Datta > Cc: linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Soren Brinkmann; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Michal Simek; Shubhrajyoti Datta > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] spi/spi-xilinx: Add clock support > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 02:17:21PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > > > + xspi->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > > + if (IS_ERR(xspi->clk)) { > > As someone pointed out on the previous version of the series this will cause > the driver to fail to probe with existing DTs. We probably need to explicitly > handle a -ENOENT as a "this clock will never appear" or something. I got comments after I sent the v2. I will update it with Lars comments. > > This also requests a single nameless clock but someone pointed out on the > previous version there are multiple clocks into the IP. Even if you only want > to add one clock right now the clock should probably be named so we can > scale up I will add a name. . > > > + } > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(xspi->clk); > > Missing blank line here. Will fix in next version > > > + if (ret) > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to enable clock.\n"); > > + > > This isn't really checking the return code - if we failed to enable the clock we > should be failing the probe, not just carrying on. Will fix. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html