The patch spi: core: Fix deadlock when sending messages has been applied to the spi tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >From 49023d2e4ead0fc9e0896331037746b267d46ad4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 12:28:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] spi: core: Fix deadlock when sending messages The function __spi_pump_messages() is called by spi_pump_messages() and __spi_sync(). The function __spi_sync() has an argument 'bus_locked' that indicates if it is called with the SPI bus mutex held or not. If 'bus_locked' is false then __spi_sync() will acquire the mutex itself. Commit 556351f14e74 ("spi: introduce accelerated read support for spi flash devices") made a change to acquire the SPI bus mutex within __spi_pump_messages(). However, this change did not check to see if the mutex is already held. If __spi_sync() is called with the mutex held (ie. 'bus_locked' is true), then a deadlock occurs when __spi_pump_messages() is called. Fix this deadlock by passing the 'bus_locked' state from __spi_sync() to __spi_pump_messages() and only acquire the mutex if not already held. In the case where __spi_pump_messages() is called from spi_pump_messages() it is assumed that the mutex is not held and so call __spi_pump_messages() with 'bus_locked' set to false. Finally, move the unlocking of the mutex to the end of the __spi_pump_messages() function to simplify the code and only call cond_resched() if there are no errors. Fixes: 556351f14e74 ("spi: introduce accelerated read support for spi flash devices") Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/spi/spi.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c index 0b2bbf144460..f565cc8901a6 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c @@ -1047,6 +1047,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_finalize_current_transfer); * __spi_pump_messages - function which processes spi message queue * @master: master to process queue for * @in_kthread: true if we are in the context of the message pump thread + * @bus_locked: true if the bus mutex is held when calling this function * * This function checks if there is any spi message in the queue that * needs processing and if so call out to the driver to initialize hardware @@ -1056,7 +1057,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_finalize_current_transfer); * inside spi_sync(); the queue extraction handling at the top of the * function should deal with this safely. */ -static void __spi_pump_messages(struct spi_master *master, bool in_kthread) +static void __spi_pump_messages(struct spi_master *master, bool in_kthread, + bool bus_locked) { unsigned long flags; bool was_busy = false; @@ -1152,7 +1154,9 @@ static void __spi_pump_messages(struct spi_master *master, bool in_kthread) } } - mutex_lock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); + if (!bus_locked) + mutex_lock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); + trace_spi_message_start(master->cur_msg); if (master->prepare_message) { @@ -1162,8 +1166,7 @@ static void __spi_pump_messages(struct spi_master *master, bool in_kthread) "failed to prepare message: %d\n", ret); master->cur_msg->status = ret; spi_finalize_current_message(master); - mutex_unlock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); - return; + goto out; } master->cur_msg_prepared = true; } @@ -1172,21 +1175,23 @@ static void __spi_pump_messages(struct spi_master *master, bool in_kthread) if (ret) { master->cur_msg->status = ret; spi_finalize_current_message(master); - mutex_unlock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); - return; + goto out; } ret = master->transfer_one_message(master, master->cur_msg); if (ret) { dev_err(&master->dev, "failed to transfer one message from queue\n"); - mutex_unlock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); - return; + goto out; } - mutex_unlock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); + +out: + if (!bus_locked) + mutex_unlock(&master->bus_lock_mutex); /* Prod the scheduler in case transfer_one() was busy waiting */ - cond_resched(); + if (!ret) + cond_resched(); } /** @@ -1198,7 +1203,7 @@ static void spi_pump_messages(struct kthread_work *work) struct spi_master *master = container_of(work, struct spi_master, pump_messages); - __spi_pump_messages(master, true); + __spi_pump_messages(master, true, false); } static int spi_init_queue(struct spi_master *master) @@ -2462,7 +2467,7 @@ static int __spi_sync(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *message, spi_sync_immediate); SPI_STATISTICS_INCREMENT_FIELD(&spi->statistics, spi_sync_immediate); - __spi_pump_messages(master, false); + __spi_pump_messages(master, false, bus_locked); } wait_for_completion(&done); -- 2.7.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html