On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:26:25AM +0900, Youngmin Nam wrote: > SPI driver on some SoCs only differ in the fifosize of each > SPI channel. It is useless to duplicate the s3c64xx_spi_port_config structure > or create a compatible name for such a change. I disagree that it is useless to do this, it means that if we realize later that there is some other difference between the implementations then we have the information in the DT to handle this without needing to update the ABI. > +Optional SoC Specific properties: > + > +- samsung,spi-fifosize: The fifo size supported by the SPI channel > + > + In units of...? FIFO sizes do get quoted in both words and bytes so it seems good to be clear.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature