Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Le 11/01/2016 16:43, Måns Rullgård a écrit : >> Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Le 08/01/2016 01:11, Mans Rullgard a écrit : >>>> The driver currently chooses between internal chip-select or gpio >>>> based on the existence of the cs-gpios DT property which fails on >>>> non-DT systems and also enforces the same choice for all devices. >>> >>> Well, I fear that such a per-device choice may impact further the driver >>> than just moving a field from one structure to another... >> >> Could you please elaborate? > > Well, the first thing that comes to my mind is that the DT property may > need to be to the SPI device node and not the controller anymore, for a > need of coherency. > That would imply modifying the binding and I don't want that for such an > useless "improvement". > >>> Moreover, I have the feeling that it was not the objective of this >>> patch. >> >> Your feeling is mistaken. If it's somehow impossible to mix CS types, >> please explain why. > > Please only fix the avr32 issue with CS gpio selection that I admit we > have. I don't need nor want to mix CS types: it just doesn't make sense > to allow it. There's also this comment in spi.h regarding struct spi_master: * @cs_gpios: Array of GPIOs to use as chip select lines; one per CS * number. Any individual value may be -ENOENT for CS lines that * are not GPIOs (driven by the SPI controller itself). -- Måns Rullgård -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html