Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] spi: imx: allow only WML aligned transfers to use DMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 05:57:06PM +0100, Anton Bondarenko wrote:
> RX DMA tail data handling doesn't work correctly in many cases with current
> implementation. It happens because SPI core was setup to generates both RX
> and RX TAIL events. And RX TAIL event does not work correctly.
> This can be easily verified by sending SPI transaction with size modulus
> WML(32 in our case) not equal 0.
> 
> Also removing change introduced in f6ee9b582d2db652497b73c1f117591dfb6d3a90
> since this change only fix usecases with transfer size from 33 to 128 bytes
> and does not fix 129 bytes etc.
> 
> This is output from transaction with len 138 bytes in loopback mode at 10Mhz:
> TX0000: a3 97 a2 55 53 be f1 fc f9 79 6b 52 14 13 e9 e2
> TX0010: 2d 51 8e 1f 56 08 57 27 a7 05 d4 d0 52 82 77 75
> TX0020: 1b 99 4a ed 58 3d 6a 52 36 d5 24 4a 68 8e ad 95
> TX0030: 5f 3c 35 b5 c4 8c dd 6c 11 32 3d e2 b4 b4 59 cf
> TX0040: ce 23 3d 27 df a7 f9 96 fc 1e e0 66 2c 0e 7b 8c
> TX0050: ca 30 42 8f bc 9f 7b ce d1 b8 b1 87 ec 8a d6 bb
> TX0060: 2e 15 63 0e 3c dc a4 3a 7a 06 20 a7 93 1b 34 dd
> TX0070: 4c f5 ec 88 96 68 d6 68 a0 09 6f 8e 93 47 c9 41
> TX0080: db ac cf 97 89 f3 51 05 79 71
> 
> RX0000: a3 97 a2 55 53 be f1 fc f9 79 6b 52 14 13 e9 e2
> RX0010: 2d 51 8e 1f 56 08 57 27 a7 05 d4 d0 52 82 77 75
> RX0020: 1b 99 4a ed 58 3d 6a 52 36 d5 24 4a 68 8e ad 95
> RX0030: 5f 3c 35 00 00 b5 00 00 00 c4 00 00 8c 00 00 dd
> RX0040: 6c 11 32 3d e2 b4 b4 59 cf ce 23 3d 27 df a7 f9
> RX0050: 96 fc 1e e0 66 2c 0e 7b 8c ca 30 42 8f 1f 1f bc
> RX0060: 9f 7b ce d1 b8 b1 87 ec 8a d6 bb 2e 15 63 0e ed
> RX0070: ed 3c 58 58 58 dc 3d 3d a4 6a 6a 3a 52 52 7a 36
> RX0080: 06 20 a7 93 1b 34 dd 4c f5 ec
> 
> Zeros at offset 33 and 34 caused by reading empty RX FIFO which not possible
> if DMA RX read was triggered by RX event. This mean DMA was triggered
> by RX TAIL event.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Bondarenko <anton.bondarenko.sama@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> index fa24637..7a68c62 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> @@ -204,8 +204,8 @@ static bool spi_imx_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi,
>  {
>  	struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
>  
> -	if (spi_imx->dma_is_inited &&
> -	    transfer->len > spi_imx->wml * sizeof(u32))
> +	if (spi_imx->dma_is_inited && transfer->len > spi_imx->wml &&
> +	    (transfer->len % spi_imx->wml) == 0)
>  		return true;

Must transfer->len really be bigger than spi_imx->wml? I would assume it
should be >= instead. And where is the * sizeof(u32) gone? If that's
unnecessary I heven't understood why.

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux