On 2 December 2015 at 00:12, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:51:06PM -0000, Michal Suchanek wrote: > >> +static inline size_t >> +spi_max_transfer_size(struct spi_device *spi) >> +{ >> + struct spi_master *master = spi->master; >> + if (!master->max_transfer_size) >> + return 0; >> + return master->max_transfer_size(spi); >> +} > > Can we change this to return SIZE_MAX instead (ie, the maximum value for > a size_t)? That way callers don't need to worry if there is a limit, if > they want to handle it they can just unconditionally assume that a limit > will be provided. Yes, that sounds reasonable. Thanks Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html