On 11/30/2015 04:51 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> +struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev, const char *name) >> +{ >> + struct dma_device *device, *_d; >> + struct dma_chan *chan = NULL; >> + >> + /* If device-tree is present get slave info from here */ >> + if (dev->of_node) >> + chan = of_dma_request_slave_channel(dev->of_node, name); >> + >> + /* If device was enumerated by ACPI get slave info from here */ >> + if (ACPI_HANDLE(dev) && !chan) > > The preferable way is to use > has_acpi_companion() instead of ACPI_HANDLE(). I have done this part based on the dma_request_slave_channel_reason(). Will switch to use the has_acpi_companion() for the next RFC. >> + chan = acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_name(dev, name); >> + >> + if (chan) >> + return chan; >> + -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html