On Monday 30 November 2015 15:45:33 Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > const char *name); > struct dma_chan *dma_request_slave_channel(struct device *dev, const char *name); > + > +struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev, const char *name); > +struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan_by_mask(const dma_cap_mask_t *mask); > + > void dma_release_channel(struct dma_chan *chan); > int dma_get_slave_caps(struct dma_chan *chan, struct dma_slave_caps *caps); > #else > @@ -1268,6 +1291,14 @@ static inline struct dma_chan *dma_request_slave_channel(struct device *dev, > { > return NULL; > } > +static inline struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev) > +{ > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > +} > The prototypes for dma_request_chan() don't match, otherwise looks good. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html