2015-11-05 21:20 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 09:11:47PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> 2015-11-05 20:28 GMT+09:00 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > The dependency is on ARCH_SUNXI || COMPILE_TEST which is not the same as >> > ARCH_SUNXI. > >> The compile test of this driver should pass even if RESET_CONTROLLER >> is not defined. >> So, it does not matter for COMPILE_TEST. > > If that is the case then the change here is that the dependency on > RESET_CONTROLLER is just redundant which isn't what the commit message > says. For compile test, right, "depends on RESET_CONTROLLER" is redundant in the first place. For run-time on real SoCs,the driver failed at the following point without the reset-controller sub-system. sspi->rstc = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); if (IS_ERR(sspi->rstc)) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't get reset controller\n"); ret = PTR_ERR(sspi->rstc); goto err_free_master; } -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html