Re: [PATCH] spi: ti-qspi: improve ->remove() callback

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>]

Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> writes:

> On 10/29/2015 03:57 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> there's no need to call pm_runtime_get_sync()
>> followed by pm_runtime_put(). We should, instead,
>> just call pm_runtime_put_sync() and pm_runtime_disable().
>
> Sry, but why do we need to call pm_runtime_put[_sync]() here?
>
> My be just pm_runtime_disable() will be ok?

and disable with unbalanced pm_runtime_get() ?

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature