> On 16.09.2015, at 06:12, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 09/04/2015 01:26 AM, Martin Sperl wrote: >> >>> On 26.08.2015, at 03:44, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 08/24/2015 02:40 AM, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> >>>> +Example: >>>> + >>>> +aux_enable: aux_enable@0x7e215004 { >>>> + compatible = "bcrm,bcm2835-aux"; >>>> + reg = <0x7e215004 0x04>; >>> >>> I'd expect that to be <0x7e215000 0x8>; >> >> The reason is that we just handle enable with this driver, >> which just requires access to the 0x7e215004 register. >> >> The 0x7e215000 register (interrupt mask) could be used by a >> cascaded interrupt-controller, but as the spi and uart drivers >> can run with shared interrupts this is not a necessity. > > The DT is supposed to describe the HW, not any particular SW's use of > the HW. If the HW block has 2 registers, so must the DT reg property. Please look at V6 of the patch-series, that uses Erics clock-patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html