Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] Revert "spi/doc: spi_master_put must be followed up by kfree"

[Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 01:47:21AM +0300, Alexey Klimov wrote:
>
>> During review of new SPI drivers I tried to understand connection
>> between comment "calling spi_master_put() and kfree() to prevent a
>> memory leak" for spi_alloc_master() in spi.c and why no driver calls
>> kfree() on error path. Looks like Uwe added this comment and later I
>> found patch from Guenter that reverted this comment but spi-imx.c was
>> not fixed for that time. Later in 2013 spi-imx was fixed. Is it
>> correct time right now to fix comment?
>
> I'm sorry but I'm not clear what you're talking about here as there's
> missing context...  where is this comment you're talking about?
>
> In general please don't send cover letters for single patches, either
> add the content to the commit message or put it after the --- if it's
> administrative stuff (like SubmittingPatches says).

Okay, understand (about formatting of subject, RESEND noise and no
cover letter for single patches). Just never send reverts before
(especially when it's re-send from 2012 year).
It's easy to see comment in patch with subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/1]
Revert "spi/doc: spi_master_put must be followed up by kfree"
It's in drivers/spi/spi.c, line 1440 in tag v4.2 released ~ 5 days
ago. Comment for function spi_alloc_master().

Sorry. Right now I see how I screwed up. Should I re-send it as single
patch with all info included (marking as RESEND)?

-- 
Best regards,
Klimov Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html