On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:36:04AM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> No I'm pondering how to fix this. I see these bindings are added by the
> commit a6e56c28a178 ("ARM: pxa: ssp: add DT bindings") but some of the types
> are not used anywhere. For instance PXA168_SSP or PXA910_SSP. Then
> PXA3xx_SSP is used in sound/soc/pxa/pxa-ssp.c and CE4100_SSP in
> drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c (where LPSS_SSP was used too before differentiating
> it).
IIRC the PXA168 and PXA910 are software compatible with the PXA3xx SPI
controller. Those SoCs never got wide distribution compared to the
older PXA models I think.
> What I'm wondering is this binding below correct in arch/arm/plat-pxa/ssp.c?
> LPSS_SSP was meant to be for Intel Intel Low Power Subsystem SPI.
> "{ .compatible = "mrvl,lpss-ssp", .data = (void *) LPSS_SSP }"
> Mika, Daniel: do you know is there any change there is a Marvell PXA
> platform compatible with Intel LPSS or is above binding bogus?
I bet it's just cut'n'paste because everything else about the driver and
all the DT is for Marvell stuff.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
