On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:07:35AM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 12:00 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:56:14PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 02:59:14PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 01:44:45PM +0200, Christian Hartmann wrote: > > > > > > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-arizona.c > > > > > and drivers/extcon/extcon-arizona.c > > > > > > > > I have already CONFIG_GPIO_ARIZONA=y, but it does not be used at all. > > > > > Is it save to ignore ?? Or should I use them as well ?? > > > > > > > If the SPI device interrupt is connected to arizona GPIO pin, then you > > > > probably need that. > > > > > > I can't see how that would work, the interrupt output isn't a GPIO. > > > > I mean that if the SPI device (codec) interrupt pin is connected to a GPIO > > pin of arizona instead of GPIO pin of the SoC itself. > > It makes no sense to connect the codec interrupt pin back to one of its > own GPIOs. If you did that the GPIO could only generate another > interrupt to itself and you'd have a circular interrupt storm that went > nowhere. Ah, arizona is the chip providing the codec functionality as well? I thought they were separate chips. In that case, I take my previus comment back. Sorry about the confusion. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html