Le 25/08/2015 11:46, Jonas Gorski a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 07:04:38 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote: >>> Hi Marek, >> >> Hi! >> >>> Le 24/08/2015 13:03, Marek Vasut a écrit : >>>> On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 12:14:00 PM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote: >>>>> This driver add support to the new Atmel QSPI controller embedded into >>>>> sama5d2x SoCs. It expects a NOR memory to be connected to the QSPI >>>>> controller. >> >> [...] >> >>>>> + /* Compute address parameters */ >>>>> + switch (cmd->enable.bits.address) { >>>>> + case 4: >>>>> + ifr |= QSPI_IFR_ADDRL; >>>>> + /*break;*/ /* fallback to the 24bit address case */ >>>> >>>> What's this commented out bit of code for ? :-) >>> >>> I just wanted to stress out there was no missing "break;". >>> I've reworded the comment to: >>> /* No "break" on purpose: fallback to the 24bit address case. */ >> >> Oh, the address is in bytes . I see, yes, it makes sense to be more >> explicit here about the purpose of the fallback. I think this change >> in the comment will make it easier for everyone who comes back in a >> few years and reads this code. > > I think you are looking for the term "(switch case) fallthrough", not > "fallback". "Fallback" makes it sound like there is something missing, > or an invalid state. > > > Jonas > will be modified in the next series, thanks for the review! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html