On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:11:08PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 04:56:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Separately to the chip select discussion one thing to highlight here is > > > > that for some reason the BIOS is listing the device as "WM510205" rather > > > > than "WM5102" - do those extra numbers mean anything and does this mean > > > > that WM50120[1-4] and possibly higher numbers are also valid? > > > From my brief discussions with the Windows guys here on this > > > basically those last two digits are being used to inform the > > > Windows driver of use-case setup. So here it will set things up > > > for whatever the Window's driver considers to be setup "5". > > Yay for scalability and abstraction. > Well it certainly is abstract. Just not the same abstraction the rest of the world is using there :(
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
