On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:45:34AM +0200, Martin Sperl wrote: > Quick question: for the auxiliar spi1 and spi2 of the BCM2835 chipset > should I create a separate driver - say spi-bcm2835aux.c - or incorporate > it into the exising spi-bcm2835.c driver. > Note that the register set for the auxiliar spi devices is totally different > so any code-overlap with the existing spi-bcm2835.c would be minimal. > Any preferences? If there's no code overlap it should be a separate driver, your proposed name sounds good.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
