Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-pxa2xx: Constify ACPI device ids

[Mathias Krause <minipli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 15 June 2015 at 11:53, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 02:22:14PM +0200, Mathias Krause wrote:
>> Constify the ACPI device ID array, it doesn't need to be writable at
>> runtime.
>
> Applied, please do make an effort to CC relevant people working on the
> code when contributing patches (I'm not seeing any of the people working
> on the Intel platforms here and I'm at a bit of a loss why Rafael and
> Len are in the CCs).

I used the list of people that are mentioned in the MAINTAINERS file:

PXA2xx/PXA3xx SUPPORT
M:  Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx>
M:  Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxx>
M:  Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
...
F:  drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx*

Was that wrong? Who else should I've send the patch to? Maybe they
should be added to the MAINTAINERS file?

Rafael and Len are on Cc because of [1] -- an effort to constify all
users of struct acpi_device_id. They're on Cc because of the ACPI
relation. I hope that clears it up.

I was uncertain how to group those changes but tried to split them up
per-system. So you're seeing only the patches where you are mentioned
as a maintainer. I thought it would be less noise this way for the
non-ACPI related patches. It's a simple patch, after all.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg58593.html


Regards,
Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html