(trimming CC a little this time, though it's still a bit large) On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:17:27AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > Admittedly, as he's using an out-of-tree driver, I'm not > sure I know exactly what failure modes he is hitting yet. Sorry, I realized I misread here. He's using spi-sunxi. Given that... ... is this code even valid? static int sun6i_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *tfr) { ... /* We don't support transfer larger than the FIFO */ if (tfr->len > SUN6I_FIFO_DEPTH) return -EINVAL; Seems like it should be looping over the transfer in multiple chunks instead. Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html