On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:39:16PM +0800, leilk liu wrote: > On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 18:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:55:42PM +0800, leilk.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Could you tell me more details about "You should also be using the core > helpers for DMA mapping"? Implement can_dma() - look for drivers providing that for examples. > > > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_spi_of_match[] = { > > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6589-spi", .data = (void *)COMPAT_MT6589}, > > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-spi", .data = (void *)COMPAT_MT8173}, > > > + {} > > > +}; > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_spi_of_match); > > There were three compatible strings listed in the DT binding but only > > two here. > MT6589 and MT8135 is compatible; > For MT8135 IC, it can use the follow way in dts to probe: > compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-spi", > "mediatek,mt6589-spi"; > And I test it's ok on MT8135 platform. So I add struct of_device_id > mtk_spi_of_match like this in spi driver code. You should list all the compatibles documented in the binding here, if some of them are the same just have them map to a single constant.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature