Hi Mark, On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 07:00:55PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 05/04/2015 05:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> >not that it matters, but this is the patch in linux-next. > >> >I am aware that several other patches have been submitted to fix the >> >problem (I think I have seen at least two); after all, I submitted the > >> Follow-up: Since you accepted one of the other patches, please make sure >> to remove my patch from your -next branch; otherwise we might end up >> with dual "depends on GPIOLIB". > > *sigh* So, what you're asking me to do here is remove the one that's > actually been applied as a bugfix for Linus. Are you *sure* that's what > you think that's a good idea? spi.git/for-next now has two fixes for the same issue, from him (April 13), and from Sato-san (May 4): - 8844d0f1cb921f70c ("spi: bcm2835: Add GPIOLIB dependency") - e0d58cdcaedd90e4 ("spi: bcm2835: depends GPIOLIB") Git merged them "nicely" when you merged 'spi/topic/bcm2835' into 'spi-next', leading to this chunk in drivers/spi/Kconfig: config SPI_BCM2835 tristate "BCM2835 SPI controller" depends on GPIOLIB depends on ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST depends on GPIOLIB I think Günter wants you to keep only the commit you will send to Linus for v4.1-rc3, and remove the other commit. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html