On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:02:28PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > I am aware that several other patches have been submitted to fix the > problem (I think I have seen at least two); after all, I submitted the > patch some three weeks ago, and many others are affected by it. I don't > really care which one of the submitted patches is applied to mainline, > as long as the problem is getting fixed. So, the way to do this is to follow up on one of the existing patches. > Repeating my comment from the patch, > "Yes, I know, this patch is in -next. Please see this e-mail as gentle reminder > to consider pushing it (or one of the other patches fixing the same problem) > into mainline." Why would I even read that far into the patch? It's patch 1 of a series, it looks like someone's just blindly sending old stuff.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
