Re: [PATCH v2] spi: omap2-mcspi: Add support for GPIO chipselects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/27/2015 10:21 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 08:55:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:44:30PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
>>
>>> +	if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio)) {
>>> +		gpio_set_value(spi->cs_gpio, (cs_active) ?
>>> +			!!(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH) :
>>> +			!(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH));
>>> +	}
>>
>> Two problems here.  One is that the above logic statement is just not
>> readable (the repitition of hecks, the ternery operator, the
>> indentation...) and the other is that the core chipselect support
>> already handles GPIO chipselects so you should really be converting the
>> driver to use that.  At the very least the code needs to be legible
>> though.
> 
> Before I send another patch how does this look?
> 
> 	if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio)) {
> 		if (cs_active)
> 			gpio_set_value(spi->cs_gpio, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH);
> 		else
> 			gpio_set_value(spi->cs_gpio, !(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH));
> 	}
> 
> If I were to attempt to convert the driver to use the core chipselect support,
> how would I go about doing it?
> 
> Is there another driver that I can use for reference?

We've recently done that for spi-img-spfi.c.

-- 
Ezequiel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux