On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:21:26PM +0200, Martin Sperl wrote: > On 2015-04-23 12:36, Mark Brown wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 09:45:16AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>I guess this has been suggested before: the spi core could provide spidev > >>access to all spi client devices which are not bound by a driver? > >I don't know if it's been suggested before, certainly nobody did the > >work to make it happen. I don't think I have a massive objection in > >principal. > Maybe until that is fixed keep the warning message but remove the > WARN_ON(...), which is responsible for the 50+ lines in dmesg which > looks like a major issue because of the full stack-trace produced > and not just a "simple" warning... No, the whole point is to be loud and obnoxious so nobody has any reason to say that they didn't know there was a problem - we already have the initial solution Geert pointed out of adding things to the ID table in the driver and I fear a simple warning isn't loud enough for something like this.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
